🔗 Share this article

At first, the former US president gave the impression to embrace a resolute position concerning Ukraine. Following making statements of "significant repercussions" last August should Putin persisted hindering ceasefire discussions, the former president eventually introduced major penalties on the Russian biggest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This action seriously hindered the Russian leader's capability to finance his war effort in Ukraine.

Yet, through his recently unveiled detailed peace initiative for the conflict, reportedly developed by American and Russian representatives lacking Ukrainian or EU input, the former president has clearly gone back to his Russia-friendly stance.

Favoring Military Action

Trump's proposal would effectively favor the Russian leader for occupying a sovereign nation while putting Ukraine's democracy in jeopardy. Despite bold declarations that "The nation's sovereignty will be confirmed", significant aspects of the plan effectively weaken that very autonomy. What represents a Russian ideal would certainly be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his real-estate past, the former president seems to consider the Ukrainian conflict as a simple territorial dispute, as if handing Russia a portion of Ukraine's soil will appease the ruler. However, Russia's invasion is not only about controlling a charred swath of industrial-devastated area in Ukraine's east. Rather, it is about Ukraine's democratic governance – and the Russian leader's obvious desire to destroy it so it no longer functions as an appealing model for the Russian citizens of the democratic leadership that Putin's growing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Territorial Giveaways

Although maintaining in status the currently separated Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's plan would compel Ukraine to surrender the entire Donetsk province. Beyond favoring Russia with territory that its troops have been unsuccessful to seize in more than a decade of warfare, this surrender would render Ukrainian defenses critically undermined.

Donetsk is the location of the nation's well-known "fortress belt", the fortified defensive positions that are a essential impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these positions, providing Russian forces a unobstructed way to the capital should he eventually opt to renew the conflict.

Defense Restrictions

Then, in a step that would make renewed hostilities easier for the Russian military, Trump would require the nation to cut the size of its military from their current approximately 800,000 personnel to a limit of six hundred thousand. Notably, Trump's initiative imposes no similar constraints on Russia's military.

Apparently as a gesture to Russia's campaign to portray Ukraine's chosen by the people government as radicals, Trump's plan states: "Every radical belief system and practices must be condemned and forbidden." As if to emphasize this aspect, it requires that "Ukraine will hold elections in this period" of a truce. Meanwhile, Trump imposes no obligation that Putin endanger his dictatorship by holding democratic processes in his own country.

Defense Assurances

Certainly, the proposal includes Russia promise not to "attack neighboring countries" and to "establish in legislation its stance of non-aggression towards Europe and the Ukrainian people". But considering that Putin has breached comparable agreements in the history – for example the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government promised to recognize the nation's sovereignty in return for surrendering its historical nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow agreed to a halt in fighting and a restoration of occupied land in the Donbas to Kyiv – for what reason should the international community believe Russia on this occasion?

For this reason the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on western protection assurances. Although the plan threatens a "immediate unified defense action" should Russia renew its aggression, and states that "The nation will receive dependable defense commitments", the particulars include fuzzy to alarming. The initiative would not only deny Ukraine accession to NATO but also preclude member states from positioning military personnel on Ukraine's soil, thus precluding the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly commanded by Britain and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been relying to deter Putin from restoring his diminished troops, re-equipping, and reinvading.

World Response

An additional parallel deal apparently would grant the nation with a similar to NATO security guarantee, in which any future "serious, intentional, and ongoing armed attack" by the Russian Federation on the country "shall be regarded as an act of war endangering the stability and safety of the Western nations." That suggests a armed reaction. But different from a powerful national defense – the nation's primary deterrent against renewed Russian aggression – the success of the side agreement would depend on the commitment of Western powers, such as Trump, to react through arms to Putin's aggression, something they have {not